CAMLOG Special Issue – Implant Navigation

Case Report 06 | 2010 Direct postoperative implant impression Fig. 23: Postoperative OPG. Fig. 26: The concluding set-up for planning the final restora- tion. Fig. 29: X-ray check 2 weeks after implant insertion. Fig. 22: Condition after suture closure around the healing caps. Fig. 24: The impression posts, screwed in for an initial closed impression. A therapeutic temporary restoration was fabricated with the aid of this initial impression. It was left in situ until the implants could be fully loaded. Fig. 25: For the impression taken immediately after surgery, the wound should be covered with rubberdam. Fig. 27: Soft-tissue healing after 2 weeks. Fig. 28: The screwed-in cones (2 degrees); these were fabricated with the aid of gold-plastic abutments. The length of the friction surfaces should not be less than 5 mm to ensure adequate friction of the electroformed secondary parts. Fig. 30: Intraoral cementing of the electroformed caps with the tertiary structure. Any transfer errors canbe eliminated with this procedure. Transgingival implant healing Insertion of the prosthetic suprastructure Fig. 31: The mandibular cone prosthesis immediately after insertion. With consistent cementing in the mouth, there were no stresses or excessively high retention forces whatsoever on the implants. Fig. 32: The permanently seated maxillary total denture and mandibular cone prosthesis with individually fired porcelain teeth in the anterior and custom shading of the plastic gingival base. Fig. 33: X-ray check 12 months after implant insertion with stable periimplant bone.