CAMLOG Speical Issue Treatment Planning

Case Report 12 | 2011 Long-term results Fig. 31: Three-year follow-up. Fig. 28: Final radiograph. The palatal splint between the two central incisors was eliminated and no protection devices were provided. Fig.30: Two weeks post-op. Note the proportions of the teeth and the dentogingival complex. Final outcome Fig. 27: Occlusal view of the final restorations. Fig. 29: T wo weeks post-op. Note the proportions of the teeth and the dentogingival complex. Restorative phase Fig. 24: The veneers are tried in. Fig. 23: Detailed view. Fig. 25: T he mandibular excursions are checked. The right- hand canine functions as a protection guide for the premolar veneer. Fig. 26: The left-hand side mandibular excursion is checked. Fig.32: Final result and smile line relations. In order to achieve a satisfying final esthetic out- come, it is necessary to also restore the distal as- pects of the central incisors and the right-hand first premolar. Metal-ceramic restorations are chosen for the implant restorations because of mechanical reasons, porcelain-laminate veneers for the other teeth for a conservative approach. Fig. 22: Abutment connection and soft-tissue contour.