CAMLOG Summary Edentulous patients

Order Surname First Name Street City, Postcode Telephone E-mail Fax to: CAMLOG Biotechnologies AG Ě Margarethenstrasse 38 &+ %DVHO Ě 6ZLW]HUODQG Ě ZZZ FDPORJ FRP Please, send me further information about the CAMLOG ® /CONELOG ® Implant System. Edentulous patients – an overview of different forms of treatment on CAMLOG ® implants Science / Clinical Research REFERENCES [1] Krennmair G, Seemann R, Weinländer M, Piehslinger E. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandi- bular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011: 26: 598-606. [2] Krennmair G, Weinländer M, Krainhöfner M, Piehslinger E. Implan- tatgetragene Deckprothesen im Unterkiefer auf Kugelgeschieben oder Teleskopkronen – eine prospektive Dreijahresstudie. Implanto- logie 2006; 14: 235-243. [3] Krennmair G, Weinländer M, Krainhöfner M, Piehslinger E. Implant- supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2006; 19: 164-170. [4] Karabuda C, Yaltirik M, Bayraktar M. A clinical comparison of pros- thetic complications of implant-supported overdentures with diffe- rent attachment systems. Implant Dent 2008; 17: 74-81. [5] Krennmair G, Sütö D, Seemann R, Piehslinger E. Removable four implant-supported mandibular overdentures rigidly retained with te- lescopic crowns or milled bars: a 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Impl. Res 2011; doi 10.1111/j.1600- 0501.2011.02169.x. [6] Weinländer M, Piehslinger E, Krennmair G. Removable implant-pros- thodontic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: five-year results of different prosthetic anchorage concepts. Int J Oral Maxillofac 2010; 25: 589-597. [7] Krennmair G, Krainhöfner M, Piehslinger E. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by four implants: a 5-year pros- pective study. Int J Prosthodont 2008; 21: 514-520. [8] Krennmair G, Krainhöfner M, Piehslinger E. Implant-supported man- dibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 987-994. [9] Xiang L, Hu X, Mehrhof J, Nelson K. Klinische Evaluation von bedingt abnehmbaren Brücken im zahnlosen Kiefer: Fünfjahresergebnisse. Quintessenz Zahntech 2011; 37(7): 906-912. [10] Xiang L, Hu X, Mehrhof J, Nelson K. Clinical evaluation of a fixed (retrievable) implant-supported prosthesis in the edentulous jaw: a 5-year report. Quintessence Int 2010;41:277-283. [11] Nelson K, Melerski M, Agariguchi A, Hildebrand D. Retrospektive klinische Studie von implantatgetragenen Galvano-Steg-Prothesen. Deutsche Zahnärztliche Zeitschrift 2006; 61: 32-37. [12] Krennmair G, Krainhöfner M, Piehslinger E. Retrospektive Vergleichs- studie zu implantatgetragenen Oberkieferdeckprothesen auf gefräs- ten Stegen. Implantologie 2008; 16(3): 287-298. [13] Krennmair G, Krainhöfner M, Piehslinger E. Implant-supported maxil- lary overdentures retained with milled bars: maxillary anterior versus maxillary posterior concept – a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxil- lofac Implants 2008; 23: 343-352. [14] Andreiotelli M, Att W, Strub JR. Prosthodontic complications with im- plant overdentures: a systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont 2010; 23(3): 195-203. Peters F, Wanner H. Zahnlose Patienten – ein Überblick über verschiedene Versorgungsformen auf CAMLOG ® Implantaten. Logo 2011;24:8-10

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTE0MzMw