Previous Page  35 / 36 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 35 / 36 Next Page
Page Background

CAMLOG&Science – References

34 | 35

Semper-Hogg W, Kraft S, Stiller S, Mehrhof J, Nelson K.

(2012)

Analytical and experimental position stability of the abutment in different

dental implant systems with a conical implant-abutment connection. Clin Oral

Investig 17(3): 1017-23

Siebers D, Gehrke P, Schliephake H.

(2010) Immediate versus delayed

function of dental implants: A 1- to 7-year follow-up study of 222 implants.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25(6): 1195-202

Steinebrunner L, Wolfart S, Bossmann K, Kern M.

(2005a) In vitro

evaluation of bacterial leakage along the implant abutment interface of

different implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 20(6): 875-81

Steinebrunner L, Bössmann K, Kern M.

(2005b) Implantat-Abutment-

Verbindungen – Präklinische Testmethoden. Implantologie 13: 145-60

Steinebrunner L.

(2006) Vergleichende Untersuchung zur bakteriellen

Penetration sowie zur Dauer- und Maximalbelastbarkeit der Verbindung

zwischen dentalen Implantaten und deren prothetischen Aufbauten. Univer-

sität Kiel, Dissertation

Steinebrunner L, Wolfart S, Ludwig K, Kern M.

(2008) Implant-

abutment interface design affects fatigue and fracture strength of implants.

Clin Oral Implants Res 19(12): 1276-84

Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D, Güth JF, Erdelt K, Happe A, Beuer

F.

(2012a) Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-

abutment interface: A comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 28(12): 1215-20

Stimmelmayr M, Erdelt K, Güth JF, Happe A, Beuer F.

(2012b)

Evaluation of impression accuracy for a four-implant mandibular model-a

digital approach. Clin Oral Investig 16(4): 1137-42

Stimmelmayr M, Güth JF, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Beuer F.

(2012c)

Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit-an in vitro

study. Clin Oral Investig 16(3): 851-6

Strietzel FP, Reichart PA.

(2007) Oral rehabilitation using Camlog

®

screw-cylinder implants with a particle-blasted and acid-etched microstruc-

tured surface. Clin Oral Implants Res 18(5): 591-600

Weinländer M, Piehslinger E, Krennmair G.

(2010) Removable im-

plant-prosthodontic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: five-year results

of different prosthetic anchorage concepts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants

25(3): 589-97

Wolf M.

(2007) Einzelzahnersatz auf CAMLOG ROOT-LINE, Nobel Biocare

Replace, und Replace Select- Implantaten nach sofortimplantation Sofortre-

konstruktion – eine 5-Jahres-Studie. Single-tooth replacement on CAMLOG

ROOT-LINE, Nobel Biocare Replace, and Replace Select implants after imme-

diate implantation/immediate reconstruction – a 5-year study. Logo 9: 9-12

Wolfart S, Moll D, Hilgers RD, Wolfart M, Kern M.

(2013) Implant

placement under existing removable dental prostheses and its effect on oral

health-related quality of life. Clin Oral Implants Res 24(12): 1354-9

Xiang L, Hu X, Mehrhof J, Nelson K.

(2011) Klinische Evaluation von

bedingt abnehmbaren Brücken im zahnlosen Kiefer: Fünfjahresergebnisse.

Quintessenz Zahntech 37(7): 906-12

Xiang L, Hu X, Mehrhof J, Nelson K.

(2010) Clinical evaluation of a

fixed (retrievable) implant-supported prosthesis in the edentulous jaw: a

5-year report. Quintessence Int 41(4): 277-83

Zabler S, Rack T, Rack A, Nelson K.

Fatigue induced deformation of

taper connections in dental titanium implants. Int J Matr Res (in press)

Zafiropoulos GGK, Deli G, Bartee BK, Hoffmann O.

(2010) Single

tooth implant placement and loading in fresh and regenerated extraction

sockets. 5 year results. A case series using two different implant designs.

J Periodontol 81(4): 604-15