Previous Page  18 / 36 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 18 / 36 Next Page
Page Background

CAMLOG&Science – Chapter 3

ZrO

2

ABUTMENTS – WEAR AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR USE

Wear is an important aspect regarding the long-term success of implant-

abutment connections. Stimmelmayr et al. (2012a) evaluated the wear of

the interface between CAMLOG

®

titanium implants and one-piece zirconia

abutments and compared it to titanium abutments in an in vitro study. Che-

wing simulation was performed with a similar test set-up as designed by

Steinebrunner et al. (2005; Fig. 10A). After loading with 1.200.000 cycles

at 100N, neither implant or abutment fractures nor abutment screw loose-

ning or screw fractures occurred. However, SEMmicrographs revealed more

wear and damage at the implants when they were connected to ZrO

2

abut-

ments. The authors supposed that the reason for these differences was the

stress distribution between components of different rigidity: When using

ZrO

2

abutments on titanium implants, deformation energy is distributed to

the material with the lower elastic properties, i.e., titanium, which results

in increased wear and abrasion.

Use and processing of ZrO

2

abutments were also discussed at a consensus

conference and the following recommendations were developed (Beuer et al.,

2011):

• ZrO

2

qualities differ in their mechanical and optical properties. Only tho-

roughly tested, well known and scientifically documented ZrO

2

qualities

should be used.

• One-piece monoblock ZrO

2

abutments with inner connections should not

be used in the lateral tooth area. In the front area, one-piece abutments

with outer connections and appropriate dimensions show fewer problems.

• Two-piece, bonded ZrO

2

abutments, do not show any limitations in use

as long as they have appropriate dimensions.

• On standardized ready-for-use ZrO

2

abutments, crowns should be fixed

in a conventional way since surplus fixation material is difficult to remove

if the crown margin is placed subgingivally.

• When using individually CAD/CAM-prepared ZrO

2

abutments with which

themargin can be placed to bewell accessible, also adhesive / semi-adhesive

systems may be used.

• In restorations which are fixed only by adhesion and without additional

retentive preparations, classical adhesive multiple step systems should be

used.

• It is strongly recommended not to fix ZrO

2

restorations provisionally.