Previous Page  11 / 36 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 36 Next Page
Page Background

CAMLOG&Science – Chapter 2

10 | 11

EFFECT OF CONNECTION DESIGN ON THE ACCURACY

OF REPOSITIONING

The theoretical calculations described above (Semper et al., 2009a; Semper

et al., 2009b and Semper et al., 2010a) were also tested in an experimental

in vitro study. Positional stability of five different implant systems (ITI, Steri-Oss,

CAMLOG

®

, Astra Tech, and Replace™Select) was compared after multiple

manual disassembly and reassembly (Semper et al., 2010b).

Five implants were arranged with varying angles in a stainless steel model

to simulate a typical clinical situation (Fig. 7). Abutments were assembled and

reassembled manually by three test persons for each implant system for 20

times by using system-specific screwdrivers. Any rotational, vertical, and

canting deviation from the initially determined position was monitored

using a coordinate reading machine. Rotational freedom ranged from 0.92

to 4.92 degrees. CAMLOG

®

showed significantly smaller rotational discre-

pancy than the other systems tested (Fig. 8A). The systems with a horizon-

tal butt-joint displayed significantly lower vertical alterations in position

than beveled implant-abutment connections (Fig. 8B). Regarding canting

discrepancies, the implant systems did not differ significantly (Fig. 8C). The

authors concluded that reposition of rotation-safe abutments on the

implants leads to a three-dimensional deviation compared to the initial

position and that the accuracy of repositioning is influenced by the geometric

design of the implant-abutment interface.

Fig. 7:

Occlusal view of the five tested implant connections

with their characteristic position indices: (A) ITI implant with

conical-joint and octagonal positional index, (B) Steri-Oss implant

with standard butt-joint and hexagonal positional index, (C)

CAMLOG

®

implant with butt-joint and cam positional index,

(D) Astra Tech implant with conical-joint and dodecagram

positional index, and (E) Replace™ Select implant with butt-

joint and polygonal positional index. (Semper et al. (2010b)

reproduced with kind permission of Quintessence Publishing co,

Inc, USA).